Field Evaluation of Protein Bait in Attracting the Melon Fruit Fly Zeugodacus cucurbitae (Coquillett) in Snake Gourd

Authors

  • K. Nithya Department of Agricultural Entomology, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University (TNAU), Madurai 625104, Tamil Nadu
  • Zadda Kavitha Department of Agricultural Entomology, Tamil Nadu Agricultural University (TNAU), Madurai 625104, Tamil Nadu
  • M. Shanthi Directorate of Centre for Plant Protection Studies, TNAU, Coimbatore 641003, Tamil Nadu
  • K. Swarnalatha Department of Chemistry, Manonmaniam Sundaranar University, Tirunelveli 627012, Tamil Nadu
  • M. L. Mini Department of Biotechnology, Agricultural College and Research Institute,Tamil Nadu Agricultural University (TNAU), Madurai 625104, Tamil Nadu

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55446/IJE.2023.1576

Keywords:

Zeugodacus cucurbitae, gel protein bait, liquid protein bait, cuelure, negative control, untreated control, snake gourd, attraction capacity, male to female ratio, evaporation

Abstract

In India, melon fruit fly Zeugodacus cucurbitae Coquillett is a destructive insect pest of cucurbits. This study evaluated its attraction towards gel protein bait, an improvised version of liquid protein bait, found to be attractive in previous studies in snake gourd. Two field experiments were conducted for four months each (preliminary one - January to April, 2023; and confirmatory one - April to July, 2023). In early fruiting and fruiting stages, gel protein bait significantly attracted more females than the liquid protein bait; as regards male, cuelure trap attracted more followed by gel protein and liquid protein bait traps. Evaporation of gel protein bait in the field conditions was comparatively less from that of liquid protein bait.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Downloads

Published

2023-11-01

How to Cite

Nithya, K., Kavitha, Z., Shanthi, M., Swarnalatha, K., & Mini, M. L. (2023). Field Evaluation of Protein Bait in Attracting the Melon Fruit Fly <i>Zeugodacus cucurbitae</i> (Coquillett) in Snake Gourd. Indian Journal of Entomology, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.55446/IJE.2023.1576

Issue

Section

Research Articles

References

Bayoumy M H, El-Metwally M M. 2017. Daily flight activity rhythms of the peach and Mediterranean fruit flies using sexual and olfactory attractants. Acta Phytopathology et Entomology Hungarica 52: 227-244.

Chinajariyawong A, Kritsaneepaiboon S, Drew R A I. 2003. Efficacy of protein bait sprays in controlling fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) infesting angled luffa and bitter gourd in Thailand. Raffles Bulletin of Zoology 51(1): 7-16.

Devi Y K, Ibrahim M M, Mehta P K. 2020. Laboratory evaluation of some indigenous raw materials for development of bait application technique (BAT) against fruit fly species, Bactrocera tau (Walker). Plant Archives 20(2): 1323-1328.

Enkerlin W R, Reyes-Flores J. 2018. Trapping guidelines for area-wide fruit fly programmes. FAO/IAEA.

Hagen K S, Franz J M. 1973. A history of biological control. Annual Review of Palocetto, California. pp. 433-467.

Indiastat: 2022. https://www.indiastat.com/data/agriculture/bitter-gourd/data-year/2022

Iqbal M, Gogi M D, Arif M J, Javed N. 2020. Attraction of melon fruit flies, Bactrocera cucurbitae (Diptera: Tephritidae) to various protein and ammonia sources under laboratory and field conditions. Pakistan Journal of Agricultural Sciences 57(4).

Jakhar S, Kumar V, Choudhary P K, Lal B. 2020. Estimation losses due to fruit fly, Bactrocera cucurbitae (Coquillett) on long melon in semi-arid region of Rajasthan.Journal of Entomology and Zoology Studies 8(6): 632-635.

Kapoor V C. 1993. Indian Fruit Flies. Oxford and IBH Publishing Co. Ltd. New Delhi. India. pp. 228-248.

Liyanage R, Nadeeshani H, Jayathilake C, Visvanathan R, Wimalasiri S. 2016. Comparative analysis of nutritional and bioactive properties of aerial parts of snake gourd (Trichosanthes cucumerina Linn.). International Journal of Food Science.

Manikantha J, Kavitha Z, Shanthi M, Subaharan K. 2022. Field evaluation of attractiveness of protein and food baits to the cucurbit fruit fly, Zeugodacus cucurbitae Coquilett. The Pharma Innovation 11(7): 4481-4486.

Maung K L, Mon Y Y, Khine M P, Chan K N, Phyoe A, Soe A T and Khai A A. 2019. Efficient Protein-based Bait Formulation for Attraction and Feeding Response of Fruit Flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) in Myanmar. Journal of Life Sciences 13: 18-24.

Mwatawala M W, De Meyer M, Makundi R H, Maerere A P. 2006. Biodiversity of fruit flies (Diptera, Tephritidae) in orchards in different agro-ecological zones of the Morogoro region, Tanzania. Fruits 61(5): 321-332.

Mwatawala M W, De Meyer M, Makundi R H, Maerere A P. 2009. Host range and distribution of fruit-infesting pestiferous fruit flies (Diptera, Tephritidae) in selected areas of Central Tanzania. Bulletin of Entomological Research 99: 629-641.

Pinero Jaime C, Steven K, Souder, Roger I, Vargas. 2020. Synergistic and additive interactions among components of food-based baits underlie female fruit fly attraction. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 168(4): 339-348.

Rajitha A R, Viraktamath S. 2005. Species diversity and relative abundance of fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) in guava and mango orchards at Dharwad. National Conference on Animal Taxonomy-Emerging Trends, Kochi.

Ravikumar P, Viraktamath S. 2007. Attraction of female fruit flies to different protein food baits in guava and mango orchards. Karnataka Journal of Agricultural Sciences 20(4): 745.

Siderhurst M S, Jang E B.2010. Cucumber volatile blend attractive to female melon fly, Bactrocera cucurbitae (Coquillett). Journal of Chemical Ecology 36: 699-708.

Sruthi A B, Kavitha Z, Shanthi M, Beaulah A. 2023. Role of protein and food baits in attraction of melon fruit fly Zeugodacus cucurbitae in bitter gourd. Indian Journal of Entomology 455-458.

Tukey J W. 1977. Exploratory data analysis 2: 131-160.

Verghese A, Shivananda T N, Jayanthi P K, Sreedevi K. 2013. Frank Milburn Howlett (1877–1920): discoverer of the pied piper’s lure for the fruit flies (Tephritidae: Diptera). Current Science 105: 260-262.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>