DNA Isolation From Six Spotted Ladybird Beetle Cheilomenes Sexmaculata (F)

Authors

  • H S Rakshith Division of Entomology; ICAR- Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110012
  • Sachin S Suroshe Division of Entomology, ICAR- Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110012
  • M C keerthi Division of Crop Protection, ICAR-Indian Institute of Horticultural Research, Hesaraghatta, Bengaluru 560089, Karnataka
  • Subhash chander Director, ICAR- National Centre for Integrated Pest Management, New Delhi 110012
  • Diya Roy Division of Microbiology, ICAR- Indian Agricultural Research Institute, New Delhi 110012

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55446/IJE.2024.2155

Abstract

DNA extraction is a routine step in many insect molecular studies and extraction methods need to be evaluated for their efficiency, cost, and side effects, such as DNA degradation. Individuals of six spotted ladybird beetle, Cheilomenes sexmaculata (F.) were subjected to DNA extraction by the CTAB method and PureLink® Kit. The methods were compared in terms of DNA quantity and quality, cost of materials, and time consumed. The CTAB method resulted in higher DNA yield (ng DNA) at a much lower price and less degradation, as revealed on agarose gels. The PureLink® Kit was the most time-efficient but costliest, and degradation was observed on agarose gels. The DNA samples obtained were tested on agarose gel PCR for six SSRs located in various positions of the beetle’s genome. The results revealed that DNA isolated from the CTAB method showed successful amplifications, but the PureLink® Kit method did not show any amplification. These evaluations guide the choice of DNA extraction methods from C. sexmaculata beetles.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Downloads

Published

2024-05-09

How to Cite

Rakshith, H. S., Suroshe, S. S., keerthi, M. C., chander, S., & Roy, D. (2024). DNA Isolation From Six Spotted Ladybird Beetle <i>Cheilomenes Sexmaculata</i> (F). Indian Journal of Entomology, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.55446/IJE.2024.2155

Issue

Section

Research Articles

References

Aljanabi S M, Martinez I. 1997. Universal and rapid salt-extraction of high quality genomic DNA for PCR-based techniques. Nucleic Acids Research 25(22): 4692-4693.

Chen M, Zhu Y Y, Tao J, Luo Y Q. 2008. Methodological comparison of DNA extraction from Holcocerrus hippophaecolus (Lepidoptera: Cossidae) for AFLP analysis. Forestry Studies in China 10(3): 189-192.

Chomczynski P, Wilfinger W, Mackey K. 1998. Isolation of genomic DNA from human, animal, and plant samples with DNAzol reagents. Biotechnology International 8: 185-188.

Clark T L, Meinke L J, Foster J E. 2001. Molecular phylogeny of Diabrotica beetles (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) inferred from analysis of combined mitochondrial and nuclear DNA sequences. Insect Molecular Biology 10(4): 303-314.

Crouse J, Amorese D. 1987. Ethanol precipitation: ammonium acetate as an alternative to sodium acetate. Focus 9(2): 3-5.

Gilbert M T P, Moore W, Melchior L, Worobey M. 2007. DNA extraction from dry museum beetles without conferring external morphological damage. PloS One 2(3): 22-27.

Hancock K, Narang S, Pattabhi S, Yushak M L, Khan A, Lin S C, Plemons R, Betenbaugh M J, Tsang V C. 2008. False positive reactivity of recombinant, diagnostic, glycoproteins produced in High FiveTM insect cells: Effect of glycosylation. Journal of immunological methods 330(1-2): 130-136.

Kim K S, Stolz U, Miller N J, Waits E R, Guillemaud T, Sumerford D V, Sappington T W. 2008. A core set of microsatellite markers for western corn rootworm (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) population genetics studies. Environmental entomology 37(2): 293-300.

Kim S H, Jeong H S, Kim Y H, Am Song S, Lee J Y, Oh S H, Kim H R, Lee J N, Kho W G, Shin J H. 2012. Evaluation of DNA extraction methods and their clinical application for direct detection of causative bacteria in continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis culture fluids from patients with peritonitis by using broad-range PCR. Annals of Laboratory Medicine 32(2): 119-125.

Linton Y M, Harbach R E, Seng C M, Anthony T G, Matusop A. 2001. Morphological and molecular identity of Anopheles sundaicus (Diptera: Culicidae), the nominotypical member of a malaria vector species complex in Southeast Asia. Systematic Entomology 26(3): 357-366.

Miller N J, Guillemaud T, Giordano R, Siegfried B D, Gray M E, Meinke L J, Sappington T W. 2009. Genes, gene flow and adaptation of Diabrotica virgifera. Agricultural and Forest Entomology 11(1): 47-60.

Miller N J, Richards S, Sappington T W. 2010. The prospects for sequencing the western corn rootworm genome. Journal of Applied Entomology 134(5): 420-428.

Obinata H, Gutkind S, Stitham J, Okuno T, Yokomizo T, Hwa J, Hla T. 2014. Individual variation of human S1P1 coding sequence leads to heterogeneity in receptor function and drug interactions. Journal of Lipid Research 55(12): 2665-2675.

Phillips A J, Simon C. 1995. Simple, efficient, and nondestructive DNA extraction protocol for arthropods. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 88(3): 281-283.

Rohland N, Siedel H, Hofreiter M. 2004. Nondestructive DNA extraction method for mitochondrial DNA analyses of museum specimens. Biotechniques 36(5): 814-821.

Shahjahan R E Z A, Hughes K, Leopold R, Devault J. 1995. Lower incubation temperatures increase yield of insect genomic DNA isolated by the CTAB method. Biotechniques 19(3): 332-340.

Steiner J J, Poklemba C J, Fjellstrom R G, Elliott L F. 1995. A rapid one-tube genomic DNA extraction process for PCR and RAPD analyses. Nucleic Acids Research 23(13): 25-29.

Waldschmidt A M, Salomao T M F, Barros E G D, Campos L D A O. 1997. Extraction of genomic DNA from Melipona quadrifasciata (Hymenoptera: Apidae, Meliponinae). Brazilian Journal of Genetics 20: 421-423.

Zeugin J A, Hartley J L. 1985. Ethanol precipitation of DNA. Focus 7(4): 1-2.

Most read articles by the same author(s)