Evaluation of an Odour Deterrent to Blue Bull Boselaphus tragocamelus and Monkey Rhesus macaque from Agricultural Fields

Authors

  • Ujjawal Kumar Singh Kushwaha National Plant Breeding and Genetics Research Center, Nepal Agricultural Research Council, Khumaltar, Lalitpur 00977

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55446/IJE.2022.525

Keywords:

Blue bull, Boselaphus tragocamelus, monkey, Rhesus macaque, wild boar, Sus scrofa, human-wildlife conflict, tri methylamine, odour deterrent, fermented fish

Abstract

An experiment was conducted to evaluate two deterrents to deter blue bull Boselaphus tragocamelus and monkey Rhesus macaque from crop fields through randomized block design experimental trials in different parts of Nepal from July 2019 to May 2021. The odour deterrent tri methyl amine @15ml/ 700 m2 and microbial fermented fish solution @4ml/ l were evaluated among 150 plots each with 50 replications including control. Significant results were obtained where >90% farmers responded that tri methyl amine repelled blue bull and monkey for >14 days. This might be due to its strong ammonia like fishy odour which was unpleasant to these animals and might had been found irritant and offensive. Similarly, many farmers replied that the microbial fermented fish solution also protected their crops from blue bull for ≥ 30 days.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Downloads

Published

2022-05-31

How to Cite

Kumar Singh Kushwaha, U. (2022). Evaluation of an Odour Deterrent to Blue Bull <i>Boselaphus tragocamelus</i> and Monkey <i>Rhesus macaque</i> from Agricultural Fields. Indian Journal of Entomology, 85(1), 6–10. https://doi.org/10.55446/IJE.2022.525

Issue

Section

Research Articles

References

Agyeman Y B, Baidoo S. 2019. Farmer’s perception of the effectiveness of strategies for managing wildlife crop depredation in Ghana. International Journal of Biodiversity and Conservation 11(6): 165-174.

Akankwasah B. 2010. The effect of crop raiding on household food security in the Albertine Rift: A case study of Queen Elizabeth National Park, western Uganda. Human Dimensions of Wildlife 15(1): 45-54.

Ansari N A. 2017. Status of mammals with special reference to population estimation of Nilgai (Boselaphus tragocamelus) and suggest mitigation measures to prevent crop damage in and around Surajpur reserve forest, Uttar Pradesh, India. Journal of Entomology and Zoology Studies 5(4): 1085-1091.

Aryal M, Panthi S, Bhatta M, Magrati T P, Shrestha A K, Shrestha P B, Karki A. 2016. Population status, distribution and potential threats of the blue bull Boselaphus tragocamelus (Mammalia: Cetartiodactyla: Bovidae) along the Tinau river of Rupendehi district Nepal. Journal of Threatened Taxa 8(14): 9638-9642.

Bhatta M, Joshi R. 2020. Analysis of human wildlife conflict in buffer zone area: A case study of Sukhlaphanta National Park, Nepal. Grassroots Journal of Natural Resources 3(3): 28-45.

Cai J, Jiang Z G, Zeng Y, Li C W, Bravery B D. 2008. Factors affecting crop damage by wild boar and methods of mitigation in a giant panda reserve. European Journal of Wildlife Research 54: 723-728.

Gehring T M, VerCauteren K C, Landrey J C. 2010. Livestock protection dogs in the 21st century is an ancient tool relevant to modern conservation challenges. Bio Science 60: 715-721.

Guinness S Mc, Taylor D. 2014. Farmers’ perceptions and actions to decrease crop raiding by forest-dwelling primates around a Rwandan forest fragment, Human Dimensions of Wildlife 19(2): 179-190.

Hayward M W, Kerley G I H. 2009. Fencing for conservation: restriction of evolutionary potential or a riposte to threatening processes. Biological Conservation 142: 1-13.

Joshi G, Neupane B, Dahal D, Shrestha S, Dhakal P, Jandug C M B, Gautam D. 2020. Assessment of human wildlife conflict in Kailali district of Nepal. Journal of Animal Diversity 2(3): 24-36.

Khanal S, Aryal A, Morley C G, Wright W, Singh N B. 2018. Challenges of conserving blue bull (Boselaphus tragocamelus) outside the protected areas of Nepal. Proceedings of the Zoological Society 71: 352-362.

Koirala P, Neupane B, Silwal T, Dhami B, Regmi S, Dahal D. 2020. Distribution of blue bull (Boselaphus tragocamelus) and its conservation threats in Bardia National Park, Nepal. Journal of Forest and Natural Resource Management 2(1): 50-60.

Kolowski J M, Holekamp K E. 2006. Spatial, temporal and physical characteristics of livestock depredations by large carnivores along a Kenyan border reserve. Biological Conservation 128: 529-541.

Manral U, Sengupta S, Hussain S A, Rana S, Badola R. 2016. Human wildlife conflict in India: A review of economic implication of loss and preventive measures. Indian Forester 142(10): 928-940.

Mason J R. 1997. Repellents. In: Wagner K K, Nolte DL (eds) Wildlife damage management for natural resource managers. Western Forestry and Conservation Association, Olympia, pp 11-16.

Meena R P, Meena B L, Nandal U, Meena C L. 2014. Indigenous methods developed by farmers to curb the menace of blue bull (Boselaphus tragocamelus) in district Rajsamand, Rajasthan, India. Indian Journal of Traditional Knowledge 13(1): 208-215.

Pandey S, Bajracharya S B. 2015. Crop Protection and its effectiveness against wildlife: A case study of two villages of Shivapuri National Park, Nepal. Nepal Journal of Science and Technology 16(1): 1-10.

Parker G E, Osborn F V. 2006. Investigating the potential for chili (Capsicum species) to reduce human-wildlife conflict in Zimbabwe. Oryx 40: 343-346.

Perez E, Pacheco L F. 2006. Damage by large mammals to subsistence crops within a protected area in a montane forest of Bolivia. Crop Protection 25: 933-939.

Poche R M, Poche D, Franckowiak G, Somers D J, Briley L N, Tseveenjav B, 2018. Field evaluation of low dose warfarin baits to control wild pigs (Sus scrofa) in North Texas. PLoS ONE 13(11): e0206070. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0206070

Poudel G, Shrestha T K. 2018. Crop depredation by monkey outside protected area in Nepal; Cost, condition and perceptions. The Indian Forester 144(10): 929-935.

Reddy A R M, Chander J. 2016. Human monkey conflict in India: some available solution for conflict mitigation with special reference to Himachal Pradesh. Indian Forester 142(10): 941-832.

Schlageter A, Wackernagel D H. 2011. Effectiveness of solar blinkers as a means of crop protection from wild boar damage. Crop Protection 30: 1216-1222.

Schlageter A, Wackernagel D H. 2012. Evaluation of an odour repellent for protecting crops from wild boar damage. Journal of Pest Science 85(2): 1-7.

Schley L, Dufrene M, Krier A, Frantz A C. 2008. Patterns of crop damage by wild boar (Sus scrofa) in Luxembourg over a 10-year period. European Journal of Wildlife Research 54: 589-599.

Sharma S, Acharya S. 2017. Human-Rhesus macaque conflict at Pumdivumdi Tallokodi, Pokhara, West Nepal. Banko Janakari 27(2): 46-50.

Sitati N W, Walpole M J. 2006. Assessing farm-based measures for mitigating humane elephant conflict in Transmara District, Kenya. Oryx 40: 279-286.

Sun J, Mausz M A, Chen Y, Giovannoni S J. 2018. Microbial trimethylamine metabolism in marine environments. Environmental Microbiology 21(2): 513-520.

Thapa K. 2016. Park-People interaction and public perceptions towards Parsa Wildlife Reserve, Nepal. Journal of Forest and Livelihood 14(1): 41-52.

Thapa S. 2010. Effectiveness of crop protection methods against wildlife damage: A case study of two villages at Bardia National Park, Nepal. Crop Protection 29: 1297-1304.

Tripathi R S, Rao V. 2016. Vertebrate pest management in agriculture. In: Agrawal P K, Verghese A, Radhakrishna S, Subaharan K (ed.) Human animal conflict in agropastoral context: Issues and policies. Indian Council of Agricultural Research, New Delhi.

Uddin M M, Ahsan M F. 2018. Do Rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) damage the unpalatable crops during conflict with human? A case study from Rampur village of Narsingdi District in Bangladesh. Journal of Wildlife and Biodiversity 2(2): 1-5.

Vedeld P, Jumane A, Wapalila G, Songorwa A. 2012. Protected areas, poverty, and conflicts: A livelihood case study of Mikumi National Park, Tanzania. Forest Policy and Economics 21: 20-31.