Diversity of Aquatic Beetles in Relation to Water Quality from Khadakwasla Dam, Pune

Authors

  • Rita Deb Zoological Survey of India, Western Regional Centre, Pune 411044, Maharashtra
  • Pallavi Takawane Department of Zoology, Prof Ramakrishna More Arts, Commerce and Science College, Akurdi, Pune 411044, Maharashtra
  • Rashmi Morey Department of Zoology, Prof Ramakrishna More Arts, Commerce and Science College, Akurdi, Pune 411044, Maharashtra
  • Sandeep Pokale Department of Zoology, Prof Ramakrishna More Arts, Commerce and Science College, Akurdi, Pune 411044, Maharashtra
  • Bithika Baidya Department of Zoology, Prof Ramakrishna More Arts, Commerce and Science College, Akurdi, Pune 411044, Maharashtra
  • Akash Bagade Department of Zoology, Prof Ramakrishna More Arts, Commerce and Science College, Akurdi, Pune 411044, Maharashtra

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55446/IJE.2023.1513

Keywords:

Maharashtra, abiotic factors, distribution, dissolved oxygen, fauna, Mutha River, habitat, Coleoptera, Dytiscidae, Hydrophilidae, Noteridae, Gyrinidae

Abstract

Physicochemical factors like pH, temperature, conductivity, total dissolved solids, salinity, and dissolved oxygen, are important water quality parameters of freshwater ecosystems. The present study is focused on the diversity of aquatic beetles and assessing physicochemical parameters. Water samples for physio-chemical analysis and aquatic beetles were collected from the Khadakwasla dam monthly throughout 2022. Results showed that pH (7.6-8.1), temperature (30.5° C to 32.5° C), conductivity (210 to 232 µs), total dissolved solids (175 to 192ppm), salinity (130-146ppm) and dissolved oxygen (5.8 -6.8 mg/L) were good for the aquatic fauna according to WHO and Indian standard values. The findings revealed a total of 15 species belonging to 9 genera and 4 families. The family Dytiscidae is the most abundant followed by Hydrophilidae, Noteridae, and Gyrinidae. The high diversity of aquatic beetles indicates the availability of good physicochemical variables, food, and vegetation that serve as breeding sites.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Downloads

Published

2023-08-14

How to Cite

Deb, R., Takawane, P., Morey, R., Pokale, S., Baidya, B., & Bagade, A. (2023). Diversity of Aquatic Beetles in Relation to Water Quality from Khadakwasla Dam, Pune. Indian Journal of Entomology, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.55446/IJE.2023.1513

Issue

Section

Research Articles

References

Balke M L, Hendrich, Yang C M. 1999. Water beetles (Insecta: Coleoptera) in the nature reserves of Singapore. Proceedings. Nature reserves survey seminar. Gardens Bulletin Singapore. 1997, 49(2): 321-331.

Ghosh S K, Nilsson A N. 2012. Catalogue of the diving beetles of India and adjacent countries (Coleoptera: Dytiscidae). Skörvnöpparn, Umeå, Supplement 3: 1-77.

Girón J C, Short A E Z. 2021. The Acidocerinae (Coleoptera, Hydrophilidae): Taxonomy, classification, and catalog of species. ZooKeys 1045: 1-136.

Hendrich L, Balke M, Yang C M. 2004. Aquatic Coleoptera of Singapore: Species richness, ecology and conservation. Raffles Bulletin of Zoology 52: 97-146.

Jaiswal D, Kumar D, Shankar S, Madasamy K. 2022. Diversity and distribution of aquatic beetles (Insecta: Coleoptera) in Kawal Tiger Reserve, Telangana, India. Species 23(71): 277-284.

Jaiswal D, Shankar S, Madasamy K, Jadhav S, Akkinapelly N. 2021. New records of genus Peschetius Guignot 1942 (Coleoptera: Dytiscidae) from Telangana, India. Proceedings of the Zoological Society 74(1): 114-117.

Jarjees F Z, Hanna N S, Toma J J. 2019. Biodiversity of aquatic insects in relation to physico-chemical parameters of Shekh Turab stream. Passer Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences 1(2): 12-16.

Margherita G, Andre S, Giovanni B, John F. 2010. The conservation value of farmland ponds: Predicting water beetle assemblages using vascular plants as a surrogate group. Biol. Conserv 143:1125-1133.

Nasserzadeh H, Komarek A. 2017. Taxonomic revision of the water scavenger beetle genus Sternolophus Solier, 1834 (Coleoptera: Hydrophilidae). Zootaxa 4282(2): 201-254.

Nilsson A N, Svensson B W. 1994. Dytiscidae predators and culicid prey in two boreal snowmelt pools differing in temperature and duration. Annales Zoologici Fennici 31: 365-376.

Nilsson A N. 2011. A world catalogue of the family noteridae, or the burrowing water beetles (Coleoptera, Adephaga). Version 16. VIII. 2011.1-54.

Pederzani F. 1995. Keys to the identification of the genera and subgenera of adult Dytiscidae (sensu lato) of the world (Coleoptera Dytiscidae). Atti dell’Accademia Roveretana degli Agiati, Contributi della Classe di Scienze Matematiche, Fisichee Naturali (7:4B) 244: 5-83.

Ruitton S, Francour P, Boudouresque C F. 2000. Relationships between algae, benthic herbivorous invertebrates and fishes in rocky sublittoral communities of a temperate sea (Mediterranean). Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science 50(2): 217-230.

Sala O E, Jackson R B. 2006. Determinants of biodiversity change: ecological tools for building scenarios. Ecology 87: 1875-1876.

Sharp D. 1882. On aquatic carnivorous Coleoptera or Dytiscidae. Scientific Transactions of the Royal Dublin Society 2(2): 179-1003.

Sheth S D, Ghate H V, Hájek J. 2018. Copelatus Erichson, 1832 from Maharashtra, India, with description of three new species and notes on other taxa of the genus (Coleoptera: Dytiscidae: Copelatinae). Zootaxa 4459 (2): 235-260.

Short A E Z. 2017. Systematics of aquatic beetles (Coleoptera): current state and future directions. The Royal Entomological Society, Systematic Entomology 43: 1-18.

Toledo M. 2008. Taxonomic notes on Asian species of Canthydrus Sharp, I. Revision of Canthydrus angularis Sharp, description of a new species and 12 lectotype designations (Coleoptera: Noteridae). Koleopterologische Rundschau 78: 55-68.

Vazirani T G. 1968. Contributions to the study of aquatic beetles (Coleoptera). A review of the subfamilies Noterinae, Laccophilina, Dytiscinae and Hydroporinae (in part) from India. Oriental Insects 2(3-4): 221-341.

Vazirani T G. 1984. The fauna of India. Coleoptera. Family Gyrinidae and Family Haliplidae. Zoological Survey of India, Calcutta, India. pp. 1-138.

Wewalka G. 2020. Revision of the Asian and Australian/Pacific species of the Hydaticus (Prodaticus) vittatus and H. (P.) daemeli species groups (Coleoptera: Dytiscidae). Koleopterologische Rundschau, 90: 25-72.

WHO. 2008. Guidelines for drinking water quality, 3rd Edition. Geneva, Switzerland.

https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241547611. Accessed: 24.01. 2023.

WHO. 2017. Guidelines for drinking water quality, 4th Edition. Geneva, Switzerland. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241549950. Accessed: 24.01. 2023.